Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium M Dothan 725A

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium M Dothan 725A

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E6300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.19 GHz vs 2.14 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.45 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Pentium M Dothan 725A  vs Core2 Duo E6300 

clock speed

overclocked clock speed (air)

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium M Dothan 725A  vs
Core2 Duo E6300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.86 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 1,066 MHz

details

Pentium M Dothan 725A  vs
Core2 Duo E6300 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 3.19 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3.45 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 3.19 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
Intel Pentium M Dothan 725A
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo E6300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus