CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of J2900 vs J1800 among desktop CPUs (up to 45W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium J2900 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium J2900  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium J2900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium J2900

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron J1800 vs the Pentium J2900.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium J2900 vs Celeron J1800

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Pentium J2900
1.18 mPixels/s
Celeron J1800
1.15 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium J2900
42.29 fps
Celeron J1800
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium J2900
62,700 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium J2900  vs
Celeron J1800 
Clock speed 2.41 GHz 2.41 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.67 GHz 2.58 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 688 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 896 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Pentium J2900  vs
Celeron J1800 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.67 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.66 GHz 2.58 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.67 GHz 2.58 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 6.24 pt/W 3.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium J2900
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus