0 Comments
| Intel Pentium J2900 vs Celeron 3561Y |
Released October, 2013
Intel Pentium J2900
- 2.41 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium J2900
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Celeron 3561Y
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron 3561Y
![]() | Newer Jan, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | Around 3.5x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 896 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 3 months later |
Features Key features of the Pentium J2900 vs Celeron 3561Y
clock speed
Pentium J2900
2.41 GHz
Celeron 3561Y
1.2 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium J2900
2 MB
Celeron 3561Y
0.5 MB
gpu clock speed
Pentium J2900
688 MHz
Celeron 3561Y
200 MHz
TDP
Pentium J2900
10W
Celeron 3561Y
11.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium J2900 | vs | Celeron 3561Y |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 11.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.77 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 10.07 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 9.34W |
details | Pentium J2900 | vs | Celeron 3561Y |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | HD | |
GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | 200 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 896 MHz | 850 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s |
Intel Pentium J2900 ![]() | Intel Celeron 3561Y ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $94 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $94 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $94 | |
Intel Core i5 3337U vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $94 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $94 | |
Intel Core i3 4130 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $94 | |
Intel Pentium N3700 vs J2900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $94 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium J2900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||