Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 800EB

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 800EB

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Dec, 1999 Release date over 15 years later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Pentium III 800EB  vs Celeron N3050 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
AES

details

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron N3050 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 4.88W
Intel Pentium III 800EB
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus