Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 800EB

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 800EB

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Celeron J1800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1800

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.41 GHz vs 0.8 GHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Dec, 1999 Release date over 13 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium III 800EB  vs Celeron J1800 

clock speed

Celeron J1800
2.41 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron J1800 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 2.41 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

details

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron J1800 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 8.13W
Intel Pentium III 800EB
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus