Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 800EB

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 800EB

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 0.8 GHz 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Dec, 1999 Release date over 13 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Pentium III 800EB  vs Celeron 1000M 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
370
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3

details

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 28.44W

bus

Clock speed 133 MHz 100 MHz
Intel Pentium III 800EB
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus