Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 800EB

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 800EB

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 130 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer May, 2006 vs Dec, 1999 Release date over 6 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium III 800EB  vs Athlon 64 3200+ 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Clock speed 0.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
370
754
AM2

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Pentium III 800EB  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 72.31W
Intel Pentium III 800EB
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus