0 Comments
| Intel Pentium III 600EB vs G2020 |
Released October, 1999
Intel Pentium III 600EB
- 0.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium III 600EB
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 12.84W |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.84 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 3.81 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the G2020
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 12.84W | vs | 44.69W | 3.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.84 $/year | vs | 48.18 $/year | 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.81 $/year | vs | 13.25 $/year | 3.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 0.6 GHz | More than 4.8x higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Oct, 1999 | Release date over 13 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium III 600EB vs G2020
clock speed
Pentium III 600EB
0.6 GHz
Pentium G2020
2.9 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium III 600EB
0.25 MB
Pentium G2020
1 MB
TDP
Pentium III 600EB
15.8W
Pentium G2020
55W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium III 600EB | vs | G2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
370 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Pentium III 600EB | vs | G2020 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 180 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 4 | 29 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15.8W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.81 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.84 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 12.84W | 44.69W |
Intel Pentium III 600EB ![]() | Intel Pentium G2020 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
G2020 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $150 | |
G2020 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $179 | |
G2020 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $76 | |
G2020 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $135 | |
G2020 vs 2120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $68 | |
G2020 vs G645 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $68 | |
G2020 vs G630 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||