0 Comments
| Intel Pentium III 600EB vs Core2 Duo E7500 |
Released October, 1999
Intel Pentium III 600EB
- 0.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium III 600EB
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 12.84W |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 82 °C | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.84 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2009
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
- 2.93 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E7500
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 12.84W | vs | 52.81W | 4.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 82 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 13.84 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 4.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 3.81 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 4.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.93 GHz | vs | 0.6 GHz | Around 5x higher clock speed | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer | Jan, 2009 | vs | Oct, 1999 | Release date over 9 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium III 600EB vs Core2 Duo E7500
clock speed
Pentium III 600EB
0.6 GHz
Core2 Duo E7500
2.93 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium III 600EB
0.25 MB
Core2 Duo E7500
3 MB
TDP
Pentium III 600EB
15.8W
Core2 Duo E7500
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium III 600EB | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
370 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 15.8W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 3.81 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 13.84 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 12.84W | 52.81W |
details | Pentium III 600EB | vs | Core2 Duo E7500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 180 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 4 | 11 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 82°C | Unknown - 74.1°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 133 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
Intel Pentium III 600EB ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E7500 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $179 | |
E7500 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $64 | |
E7500 vs E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $125 | |
E7500 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
E7500 vs 260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
E7500 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
E7500 vs E8500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||