Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 600EB

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 600EB

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.6 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 1999 Release date over 15 years later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.84W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.81 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.84 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium III 600EB  vs Celeron N3050 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 600EB  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 0.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium III 600EB  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 320 MHz

power consumption

TDP 15.8W 6W
Annual home energy cost 3.81 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.84 $/year 5.26 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.84W 4.88W
Intel Pentium III 600EB
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus