0 Comments
| Intel Pentium III 600E vs Core2 Duo T7400 |
Released October, 1999
Intel Pentium III 600E
- 0.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium III 600E
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 15.84W |
![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 4.7 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 17.08 $/year |
VS
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T7400
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T7400
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.16 GHz | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 15.84W | vs | 27.63W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 4.7 $/year | vs | 8.19 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.08 $/year | vs | 29.78 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 0.6 GHz | More than 3.5x higher clock speed | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Newer | Aug, 2006 | vs | Oct, 1999 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
Features Key features of the Pentium III 600E vs Core2 Duo T7400
clock speed
Pentium III 600E
0.6 GHz
Core2 Duo T7400
2.16 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium III 600E
0.25 MB
Core2 Duo T7400
4 MB
TDP
Pentium III 600E
19.5W
Core2 Duo T7400
34W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium III 600E | vs | Core2 Duo T7400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
370 | |||
479 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 19.5W | 34W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.7 $/year | 8.19 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 17.08 $/year | 29.78 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 15.84W | 27.63W |
details | Pentium III 600E | vs | Core2 Duo T7400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 180 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 6 | 13 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 100 MHz | 667 MHz |
Intel Pentium III 600E ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo T7400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T7600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T7200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs Core Duo T2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $177 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T5500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs Core Duo T2600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T5600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $236 | |
Intel Core2 Duo T7400 vs T8300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||