0 Comments
| Intel Pentium III 600E vs Atom N270 |
Released October, 1999
Intel Pentium III 600E
- 0.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium III 600E
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released June, 2008
Intel Atom N270
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Atom N270
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 0.6 GHz | Around 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
More l2 cache | 0.5 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Newer | Jun, 2008 | vs | Oct, 1999 | Release date over 8 years later | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 2.03W | vs | 15.84W | 7.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 0.6 $/year | vs | 4.7 $/year | 7.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 2.19 $/year | vs | 17.08 $/year | 7.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium III 600E vs Atom N270
clock speed
Pentium III 600E
0.6 GHz
Atom N270
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium III 600E
0.25 MB
Atom N270
0.5 MB
TDP
Pentium III 600E
19.5W
Atom N270
2.5W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium III 600E | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
370 | |||
437 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 19.5W | 2.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.7 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 17.08 $/year | 2.19 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 15.84W | 2.03W |
details | Pentium III 600E | vs | Atom N270 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 180 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 6 | 12 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 100 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Pentium III 600E ![]() | Intel Atom N270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N450 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$64 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N455 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $32 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $32 | |
Intel Atom N2600 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
Intel Atom N280 vs N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | ||
AMD G G-T44R vs Intel Atom N270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||