Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium III 600E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium III 600E

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Lower typical power consumption 15.84W vs 30.2W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 4.7 $/year vs 12 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 17.08 $/year vs 28.21 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.6 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Oct, 1999 Release date over 11 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 82 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Features Key features of the Pentium III 600E  vs E 350 

clock speed

E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

E 350
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium III 600E  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 0.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

details

Pentium III 600E  vs
E 350 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 6 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 82°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz

power consumption

TDP 19.5W 18W
Annual home energy cost 4.7 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 17.08 $/year 28.21 $/year
Typical power consumption 15.84W 30.2W
Intel Pentium III 600E
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus