0 Comments
| Intel Pentium III 600B vs AMD Sempron 3000+ |
Released September, 1999
Intel Pentium III 600B
- 0.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium III 600B
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 85 °C |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.03W |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 1.8 GHz |
![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 85 °C | vs | 70 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.03W | vs | 50.38W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.31 $/year | vs | 14.94 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.22 $/year | vs | 54.31 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 0.6 GHz | More than 3x higher clock speed | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed |
Features Key features of the Pentium III 600B vs Sempron 3000+
clock speed
Pentium III 600B
0.6 GHz
Sempron 3000+
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium III 600B
0.5 MB
Sempron 3000+
0.13 MB
TDP
Pentium III 600B
34.5W
Sempron 3000+
62W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium III 600B | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
SSE2 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 34.5W | 62W | |
Annual home energy cost | 8.31 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 30.22 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 28.03W | 50.38W |
details | Pentium III 600B | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.13 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 250 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 85°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 133 MHz | 200 MHz |
Intel Pentium III 600B ![]() | AMD Sempron 3000+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3200+ vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$163 | ||
945 vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Athlon 64 3000+ vs Sempron 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3100+ vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Athlon XP 3000+ vs Sempron 3000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
631 vs 3000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||