Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Slightly lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 4.88W 6x lower typical power consumption
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 1.45 $/year 6x lower annual home energy cost
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 5.26 $/year 6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel N3160

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3160

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 0.3 GHz More than 5.2x higher clock speed
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 17 years later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs N3160 

clock speed

N3160
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

N3160
2 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
N3160 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 1.6 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
N3160 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 6W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 5.26 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 4.88W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
Intel N3160
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus