Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 52.81W 65x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 65x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 65x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E8400

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 0.25 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 0.3 GHz More than 10x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 9 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs Core2 Duo E8400 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core2 Duo E8400 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 3 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

bus

Clock speed 66 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core2 Duo E8400 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 6 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 65W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 52.81W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus