0 Comments
| Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core2 Duo E8400 |
Released January, 1999
Intel Pentium II 300PE
- 0.3 GHz
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium II 300PE
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo E8400
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E8400
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 0.81W | vs | 52.81W | 65x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 65x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 65x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | More than 10x higher clock speed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Newer | Jan, 2008 | vs | Jan, 1999 | Release date over 9 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE vs Core2 Duo E8400
clock speed
Pentium II 300PE
0.3 GHz
Core2 Duo E8400
3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium II 300PE
0.25 MB
Core2 Duo E8400
6 MB
TDP
Core2 Duo E8400
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 66 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core2 Duo E8400 |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 6 MB | |
Manufacture process | 250 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 1W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 0.81W | 52.81W |
Intel Pentium II 300PE ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $179 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $64 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium E5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Quad Q9400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E8500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||