0 Comments
| Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 6700K |
Released January, 1999
Intel Pentium II 300PE
- 0.3 GHz
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium II 300PE
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i7 6700K
- 4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 6700K
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 0.81W | vs | 73.94W | 91x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | vs | 21.92 $/year | 91x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | vs | 79.72 $/year | 91x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | More than 13.2x higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 1999 | Release date over 16 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 6700K
clock speed
Pentium II 300PE
0.3 GHz
Core i7 6700K
4 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium II 300PE
0.25 MB
Core i7 6700K
1 MB
TDP
Core i7 6700K
91W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i7 6700K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 4 GHz | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes |
details | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i7 6700K |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB | |
Manufacture process | 250 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 1W | 91W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | 21.92 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | 79.72 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 0.81W | 73.94W |
Intel Pentium II 300PE ![]() | Intel Core i7 6700K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | $350 | |
5820K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $350 | |
6700 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $350 | |
8350 vs 6700K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
Never touch a 90s system (11:33 PM, January 1, 2017)
Luke (03:26 AM, December 11, 2016)