Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 5960X

older Released January, 1999

Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium II 300PE

	Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W		Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year
	Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year

older Released July, 2014

Reasons to buy the Core i7 5960X

	Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm		Much higher clock speed 3 GHz
	Has a NX bit Yes		Newer Jul, 2014

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction

Much lower typical power consumption

0.81W

113.75W

140x lower typical power consumption

Much lower annual home energy cost

0.24 $/year

33.73 $/year

140x lower annual home energy cost

Much lower annual commercial energy cost

0.88 $/year

122.64 $/year

140x lower annual commercial energy cost

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 5960X

Report a correction

Much newer manufacturing process

22 nm

250 nm

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor

Much higher clock speed

3 GHz

0.3 GHz

More than 10x higher clock speed

Has a NX bit

Yes

Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Newer

Jul, 2014

Jan, 1999

Release date over 15 years later

clock speed

Pentium II 300PE

0.3 GHz

Core i7 5960X

3 GHz

TDP

Pentium II 300PE

Core i7 5960X

140W

summary	Pentium II 300PE	Core i7 5960X
Clock speed	0.3 GHz	3 GHz
features
Has a NX bit	No	Yes
bus
Clock speed	66 MHz	0 MHz

details	Pentium II 300PE	Core i7 5960X
Manufacture process	250 nm	22 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
power consumption
TDP	1W	140W
Annual home energy cost	0.24 $/year	33.73 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	0.88 $/year	122.64 $/year
Typical power consumption	0.81W	113.75W

Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction

Intel Core i7 5960X

Report a correction

Compare

Popular Comparisons

Comments

Showing 14 comments.

Technofix Maldonado (12:29 AM, August 23, 2016)

The sickest processor, Pentium ii, no one's better than this beast.

Robert cook (07:00 PM, August 25, 2015)

This page should not exist, but I am glad it does.

Guest (10:33 PM, August 11, 2015)

I know which one I could pick up cheaper..

Lovethecreeper (10:37 PM, April 22, 2015)

I WANT ONE!

Бенедикт Спиноза (02:05 PM, April 15, 2015)

0.3 GHz * 140 w = 42 GHz EZ

bobbybrwn123 (04:23 AM, April 13, 2015)

the computer inside my washing machine is faster than this...

Jon Gray (05:33 PM, March 31, 2015)

PII 300MHz... aka, when I used to "OC" by pressing the turbo button on my fugly biege case.

Guest (02:11 AM, March 9, 2015)

lol what

axel bordon (10:23 PM, February 25, 2015)

potato

Germany (02:57 PM, February 1, 2015)

I think most of us went into this comparison to see how much our world got faster! Or maybe how faster we think it gets

IsThisTrue? (03:36 PM, January 23, 2015)

this other website has some detailed info regarding the compared processors - http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=347&pgno=8 - i think the Intel Atoms are a lot power efficient versus other processors (wattage & speed factors included) Intel P2 300 PE is 11.1W not 1W as stated here this is a lot lower than that - Intel Z500 / 800mhz / 0.65W

Alex (06:54 PM, January 21, 2015)

250nm and 1w this is good.

Lolz (10:07 PM, January 18, 2015)

I think this pentium is true better.

Anānimus (08:22 PM, January 15, 2015)

Fair comparison, i guess, i'll try to get P3 somewhere...

	VS
$350		$1,016
6700K vs 5960X

	VS
$272		$1,016
4790K vs 5960X

	VS
$580		$1,016
5930K vs 5960X

	VS
$230		$1,016
9590 vs 5960X

	VS
$390		$1,016
5820K vs 5960X

	VS
$4,115		$1,016
E5-2699 v3 vs 5960X

	VS
$1,156		$1,016
4960X vs 5960X

	VS
$300		$305
2500 vs W3520

	VS
$350		$272
6700K vs 4790K

	VS
		$281
6410 vs 4200U

	VS
		$281
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U

	VS
$161		$275
N3540 vs 4005U

	VS
$225		$134
3217U vs 847

	VS
		$180
5200 vs 3470

Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 5960X