0 Comments
| Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 5960X |
Released January, 1999
Intel Pentium II 300PE
- 0.3 GHz
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium II 300PE
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Core i7 5960X
- 3 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 5960X
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Has a NX bit Yes | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 0.81W | vs | 113.75W | 140x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | vs | 33.73 $/year | 140x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | vs | 122.64 $/year | 140x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | More than 10x higher clock speed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Jan, 1999 | Release date over 15 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE vs Core i7 5960X
clock speed
Pentium II 300PE
0.3 GHz
Core i7 5960X
3 GHz
TDP
Core i7 5960X
140W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i7 5960X |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 66 MHz | 0 MHz |
details | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i7 5960X |
---|---|---|---|
Manufacture process | 250 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 1W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | 33.73 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | 122.64 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 0.81W | 113.75W |
Intel Pentium II 300PE ![]() | Intel Core i7 5960X ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,016 | |
6700K vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $1,016 | |
4790K vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$580 | $1,016 | |
5930K vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$390 | $1,016 | |
5820K vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $1,016 | |
9590 vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $1,016 | |
E5-2699 v3 vs 5960X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,156 | $1,016 | |
4960X vs 5960X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 15 comments.
Technofix Maldonado (12:29 AM, August 23, 2016)
Robert cook (07:00 PM, August 25, 2015)
Guest (10:33 PM, August 11, 2015)
Lovethecreeper (10:37 PM, April 22, 2015)
Бенедикт Спиноза (02:05 PM, April 15, 2015)
bobbybrwn123 (04:23 AM, April 13, 2015)
Jon Gray (05:33 PM, March 31, 2015)
Guest (02:11 AM, March 9, 2015)
axel bordon (10:23 PM, February 25, 2015)
Espinosidro (05:05 PM, February 12, 2015)
Germany (02:57 PM, February 1, 2015)
IsThisTrue? (03:36 PM, January 23, 2015)
Alex (06:54 PM, January 21, 2015)
Lolz (10:07 PM, January 18, 2015)
Anānimus (08:22 PM, January 15, 2015)