Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 68.25W 84x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 84x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 84x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 0.3 GHz Around 11.8x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 14 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs Core i7 4770K 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 3.5 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core i7 4770K 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 84W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 68.25W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus