0 Comments
| Intel Pentium II 300PE vs Core i5 2500K |
Released January, 1999
Intel Pentium II 300PE
- 0.3 GHz
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium II 300PE
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2500K
- 3.3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i5 2500K
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz |
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 0.81W | vs | 112.55W | 138.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | vs | 41.29 $/year | 171.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | vs | 110.03 $/year | 125.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 0.3 GHz | 11x higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Newer | Jan, 2011 | vs | Jan, 1999 | Release date over 12 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE vs Core i5 2500K
clock speed
Pentium II 300PE
0.3 GHz
Core i5 2500K
3.3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium II 300PE
0.25 MB
Core i5 2500K
1 MB
TDP
Core i5 2500K
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i5 2500K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes |
details | Pentium II 300PE | vs | Core i5 2500K |
---|---|---|---|
L2 cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB | |
Manufacture process | 250 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 1W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.24 $/year | 41.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 0.88 $/year | 110.03 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 0.81W | 112.55W |
Intel Pentium II 300PE ![]() | Intel Core i5 2500K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $220 | |
Intel Core i5 3570K vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $220 | |
Intel Core i5 3470 vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $220 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $220 | |
Intel Core i5 4690K vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $220 | |
Intel Core i5 4460 vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$330 | $220 | |
Intel Core i7 2600K vs i5 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $220 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i5 2500K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||