Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 112.55W 138.5x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 41.29 $/year 171.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 110.03 $/year 125.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500K

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 0.3 GHz 11x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 12 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs Core i5 2500K 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core i5 2500K 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 3.3 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Core i5 2500K 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 95W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 41.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 110.03 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 112.55W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus