Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 59.31W 73x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 17.59 $/year 73x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 63.95 $/year 73x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron D 335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 335

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 0.3 GHz More than 9.2x higher clock speed
Newer Jun, 2004 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 5 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs Celeron D 335 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Celeron D 335 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 2.8 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No No

bus

Clock speed 66 MHz 533 MHz

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
Celeron D 335 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 73W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 63.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 59.31W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 335
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus