Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium II 300PE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium II 300PE

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 159.66W 196.5x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 232.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 182.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 250 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 0.25 MB 32x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 0.3 GHz More than 13.2x higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Jan, 1999 Release date over 13 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium II 300PE  vs FX 8350 

clock speed

FX 8350
4 GHz

L2 cache

FX 8350
8 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium II 300PE  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 0.3 GHz 4 GHz

features

Has a NX bit No Yes

bus

Clock speed 66 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Pentium II 300PE  vs
FX 8350 
L2 cache 0.25 MB 8 MB
Manufacture process 250 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 1W 125W
Annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year 159.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 0.81W 159.66W
Intel Pentium II 300PE
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus