Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium G630T

Front view of Intel Pentium G630T
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Intel Celeron G1610

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G630T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G630T

Report a correction
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 5% better turbo clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 44.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 48.18 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 13.25 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1610

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1610

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 2.47 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.68 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jul, 2011 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G630T vs Celeron G1610

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G630T
2,789
Celeron G1610
3,517

GeekBench

Pentium G630T
2,789
Celeron G1610
3,727

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Pentium G630T
2,123
Celeron G1610
2,498

PassMark (Single Core)

Pentium G630T
1,179
Celeron G1610
1,397

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium G630T  vs
Celeron G1610 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 35W 55W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 3.13 pt/W 1.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 44.69W

bus
Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

 Pentium G630T  vs
Celeron G1610 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 23 26

overclocking
Overclock popularity 0 6
Overclocked clock speed 2.47 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 2.68 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.47 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 3
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 17,066.66 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Pentium G630T
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1610
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss