CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G630 vs Q9400

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

overclock popularity

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Pentium G630 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G630  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium G630

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium G630

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G630

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,376 vs 1,137 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Marginally newer Jul, 2011 vs Jul, 2008 Release date over 3 years later
Better performance per dollar 6 pt/$ vs 4.78 pt/$ More than 25% better performance per dollar
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q9400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better PassMark score 3,424 vs 2,407 More than 40% better PassMark score
Higher Maximum Operating Temperature 71.4 °C vs 69.1 °C Around 5% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Slightly better 3DMark11 physics score 3,320 vs 2,530 More than 30% better 3DMark11 physics score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G630 vs Core2 Quad Q9400

GeekBench

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Pentium G630 Core2 Quad Q9400 @ community.futuremark.com
Benchmark Results: The 3DMark 2006 CPU test showed that the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 performed right between the AMD Phenom II X4 940 and 920 processors.
Core2 Quad Q9400 | by Legit Reviews (Mar, 2009)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G630  vs
Core2 Quad Q9400 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.66 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium G630  vs
Core2 Quad Q9400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nms 45 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 27 8
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 71.4°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 3 34

power consumption

TDP 65W 95W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 6.27 pt/W 5.29 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 77.19W
Intel Pentium G630
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus