0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G622 vs AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Pentium G622
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G622
![]() | Much more l3 cache 3 MB | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core | ![]() | Newer Apr, 2011 |
VS
Released June, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 250
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 250
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.72 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Newer | Apr, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.72 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 74 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.04 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the Pentium G622 vs Athlon II X2 250
clock speed
Pentium G622
2.6 GHz
Athlon II X2 250
3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium G622
1 MB
Athlon II X2 250
2 MB
L3 cache
Pentium G622
3 MB
Athlon II X2 250
0 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium G622
2.6 GHz
Athlon II X2 250
3.72 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium G622
2.6 GHz
Athlon II X2 250
4.04 GHz
TDP
Pentium G622
65W
Athlon II X2 250
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G622 | vs | Athlon II X2 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
BMI1 | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
ABM | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W |
details | Pentium G622 | vs | Athlon II X2 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 4.04 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A |
Intel Pentium G622 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 250 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
250 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
250 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
250 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 640 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||