Intel Pentium G622 vs AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Pentium G622
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G622
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
VS
Released June, 2009
AMD Athlon II X2 250
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 250
| | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.72 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.06 GHz |
by Legit Reviews (Jun, 2009)Benchmark Results: Looking at POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 25, the benchmark showed the Phenom II X2 550 was 3 seconds quicker than the Athlon II X2 250.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.72 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.06 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium G622 vs Athlon II X2 250
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G622 | vs | Athlon II X2 250 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| AM3 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| ABM | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
details | Pentium G622 | vs | Athlon II X2 250 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 74°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 4.06 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 3.72 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium G622  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II X2 250 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $30 | $117 | |
| 250 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $20 | |
| 250 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $90 | |
| 250 vs 5000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $50 | |
| 250 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $17 | |
| 250 vs 550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $80 | |
| 250 vs 965 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $65 | |
| 250 vs 640 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $168 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs N4200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $296 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A6-9220 | ||
