Winner
AMD Turion 64 X2 58
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion 64 X2 58 based on its power consumption.
See full details Intel Pentium G620 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 58 |
Released April, 2011
Intel Pentium G620
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
7.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G620
 | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released May, 2007
AMD Turion 64 X2 58
- 1.9 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Turion 64 X2 58
| | Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G620 vs 58 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,794 | vs | 779 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,219 | vs | 1,434 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2011 | vs | May, 2007 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 25.19W | vs | 70.8W | 2.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | vs | 27.64 $/year | 3.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | vs | 66.84 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G620 vs Turion 64 X2 58
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G620 | vs | Turion 64 X2 58 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| S1 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
details | Pentium G620 | vs | Turion 64 X2 58 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 31W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.64 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 66.84 $/year | 27.16 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.64 pt/W | 2 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 70.8W | 25.19W | |
 Intel Pentium G620  Report a correction |  AMD Turion 64 X2 58 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $150 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $145 | $70 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $70 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $76 | $70 | |
| Intel Pentium G2030 vs G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs Pentium G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G620 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | $70 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Pentium G620 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
