CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G620 vs 58 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Turion 64 X2 58 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion 64 X2 58  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G620

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,794 vs 779 More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,219 vs 1,434 Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Apr, 2011 vs May, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 58

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 58

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 70.8W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 69.1 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 27.64 $/year 3.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 66.84 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G620 vs Turion 64 X2 58

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G620
128,700 MB/s
Turion 64 X2 58
51,850 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G620  vs
Turion 64 X2 58 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Pentium G620  vs
Turion 64 X2 58 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69.1°C Unknown - 95°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 850 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 65W 31W
Annual home energy cost 27.64 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 66.84 $/year 27.16 $/year
Performance per watt 1.64 pt/W 2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 70.8W 25.19W
Intel Pentium G620
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 58
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus