Winner
AMD Turion 64 X2 58
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Turion 64 X2 58 based on its power consumption.
See full details | Intel Pentium G620 vs AMD Turion 64 X2 58 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,794 | vs | 779 | More than 2.2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 3,219 | vs | 1,434 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Newer | Apr, 2011 | vs | May, 2007 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 25.19W | vs | 70.8W | 2.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 69.1 °C | More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | vs | 27.64 $/year | 3.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | vs | 66.84 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Pentium G620 | vs | Turion 64 X2 58 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
S1 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 |
details | Pentium G620 | vs | Turion 64 X2 58 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 69.1°C | Unknown - 95°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.64 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 66.84 $/year | 27.16 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.64 pt/W | 2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 70.8W | 25.19W |
Intel Pentium G620 ![]() | AMD Turion 64 X2 58 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $70 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$135 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 2120 vs Pentium G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $70 | |
Intel Pentium G2020 vs G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $70 | |
Intel Pentium G2030 vs G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $70 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $70 | |
Intel Core i5 2400 vs Pentium G620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||