Winner
Intel Pentium G3258
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G3258 based on its single-core performance.
See full details Intel Pentium G4400 vs G3258 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Pentium G4400
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
8.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G4400
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much better performance per dollar 3.62 pt/$ |
| | Newer Jul, 2015 | | Slightly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 14.74 mHash/s |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Pentium G3258
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the G3258
| | Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,149 |
by Shawn-Baker (Jul, 2014)Pairing it with something like the R9 280X and a 1920x1080 monitor will make for a really awesome gaming system that will offer strong performance and won't break the bank.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G4400 vs G3258 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.62 pt/$ | vs | 2.57 pt/$ | More than 40% better performance per dollar | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Slightly better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 14.74 mHash/s | vs | 6.52 mHash/s | More than 2.2x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
| |||||||
| Better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,149 | vs | 1,879 | Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G4400 vs G3258
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G4400 | vs | G3258 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 53W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 12.77 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 46.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.11 pt/W | 3.39 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 43.06W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium G4400 | vs | G3258 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.94 GHz | 4.43 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.41 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.94 GHz | 4.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 65,536 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium G4400  Report a correction |  Intel Pentium G3258 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $58 | $117 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs Core i3 6100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $58 | ||
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs AMD A8 7600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $58 | $42 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs G3900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $58 | $81 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs AMD FX 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $58 | $117 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $58 | $65 | |
| Intel Pentium G4400 vs G3260 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $70 | $65 | |
| Intel Pentium G3258 vs AMD Athlon X4 860K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $296 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $168 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A10 7th Gen A10-9600P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 5200U vs AMD A8 7410 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $296 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $1,523 | |
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs 7200U | ||
Comments
Showing 4 comments.
