CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G4400 vs 965 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium G4400 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G4400  based on its single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G4400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G4400

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 152.93W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 2.8 pt/$ vs 0.94 pt/$ Around 3x better performance per dollar
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 54.06 $/year 4.2x lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Nov, 2009 Release date over 5 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,879 vs 1,361 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 152.42 $/year 3.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.28 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 3 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 5,916 vs 3,597 Around 65% better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G4400 vs Phenom II X4 965

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G4400
5,770 MB/s
Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G4400  vs
Phenom II X4 965 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 54W 140W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 54.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 152.42 $/year
Performance per watt 3.28 pt/W 1.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 152.93W

details

Pentium G4400  vs
Phenom II X4 965 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L3 cache 3 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.99 GHz 4.05 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.19 GHz 4.22 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.99 GHz 4.05 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 510 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
Intel Pentium G4400
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus