Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3420

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 3 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 81.25W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 24.09 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 87.6 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 9 months later
Front view of AMD Athlon X4 750k

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X4 750k

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.46 GHz vs 3.31 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.01 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3420 vs Athlon X4 750k

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3420
184,000 MB/s
Athlon X4 750k
2,240,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3420  vs
Athlon X4 750k 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 54W 100W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 24.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 87.6 $/year
Performance per watt 2.82 pt/W 8.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 81.25W

details

Pentium G3420  vs
Athlon X4 750k 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.31 GHz 4.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 5.01 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,134.4 2,303.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.31 GHz 4.46 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,150 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Intel Pentium G3420
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X4 750k
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
yes. go for AMD . 4 cores much better
In my country g3420 costs same the x4 750k... I things i chose X4 750k. And you?
comments powered by Disqus