Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3320TE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3320TE

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Jun, 2009 Release date over 4 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,350 vs 1,008 Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per watt 3.56 pt/W vs 1.79 pt/W Around 2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon II X2 250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II X2 250

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.72 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.04 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3320TE vs Athlon II X2 250

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3320TE  vs
Athlon II X2 250 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1150
AM3
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
ABM
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 3.56 pt/W 1.79 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W

details

Pentium G3320TE  vs
Athlon II X2 250 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 74°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.3 GHz 3.72 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 4.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.3 GHz 3.72 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD (Haswell) N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A
Intel Pentium G3320TE
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus