Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3260T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3260T

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 1.86 pt/$ vs 0.48 pt/$ More than 3.8x better performance per dollar
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,713 vs 467 Around 3.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,043 vs 1,584 More than 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz vs 2.14 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 28.44W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 8.65 pt/W vs 3.4 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz vs 200 MHz 60% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3260T vs Celeron N3050

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3260T
181 MB/s
Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3260T  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 6W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 3.4 pt/W 8.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 4.88W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 FSB
Number of links 0 1

details

Pentium G3260T  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 22 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Pentium G3260T
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus