CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G3260 vs 7800 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium G3260 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G3260  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3260

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3260

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 43.06W vs 52.81W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 71.3 °C Almost the same
Lower annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year vs 56.94 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year vs 15.66 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A10 7800

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 7800

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.19 GHz vs 3.37 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3260 vs A10 7800

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium G3260
16.62 fps
A10 7800
315.42 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 7800
6,163

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A10 7800
2,099

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3260
72.9 MB/s
A10 7800
2,090 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A10 7800
5,051

PassMark (Single Core)

A10 7800
1,537

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3260  vs
A10 7800 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

power consumption

TDP 53W 65W
Annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.14 pt/W 4.33 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.06W 52.81W

details

Pentium G3260  vs
A10 7800 
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.37 GHz 4.19 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.37 GHz 4.19 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ R7
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 720 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-2133
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 34,133.32 MB/s
Intel Pentium G3260
Report a correction
AMD A10 7800
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus