0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G3258 vs G3250 |
Released April, 2014
Intel Pentium G3258
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G3258
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.42 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.6 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.42 GHz | vs | 3.23 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date 3 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3258 vs G3250
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium G3258
6.52 mHash/s
Pentium G3250
9.78 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Pentium G3258
8.36 mPixels/s
Pentium G3250
9.24 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium G3258
0.82 fps
Pentium G3250
0.65 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3258
5,897
Pentium G3250
4,421
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3258
3,241
Pentium G3250
2,423
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3258
231,200 MB/s
Pentium G3250
180.8 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium G3258
3,919
Pentium G3250
3,257
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium G3258
2,149
Pentium G3250
1,860
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G3258 | vs | G3250 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 53W | 53W | |
Annual home energy cost | 12.77 $/year | 12.77 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 46.43 $/year | 46.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.41 pt/W | 1.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 43.06W | 43.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 0 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium G3258 | vs | G3250 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.42 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.42 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Pentium G3258 ![]() | Intel Pentium G3250 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $98 | |
G3250 vs 4130 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $75 | |
G3258 vs 860K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $98 | |
G3258 vs 4130 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $63 | |
G3258 vs G4400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $100 | |
G3258 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $120 | |
G3258 vs 4160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $190 | |
G3258 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
HydridGamer (07:19 AM, August 20, 2018)
Kornelije Kovac (01:22 AM, January 25, 2016)
phenomgamer (06:52 PM, January 1, 2016)