Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3250

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3250

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Much lower typical power consumption 43.06W vs 72.31W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 70 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year vs 77.96 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year vs 21.44 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 64 3000+ vs the Intel Pentium G3250.

Features Key features of the Pentium G3250  vs Athlon 64 3000+ 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3250  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Pentium G3250  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Threads 2 1
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 53W 89W
Annual home energy cost 12.77 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 46.43 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 43.06W 72.31W
Intel Pentium G3250
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus