0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G550T |
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G3220
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Celeron G550T
- 2.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron G550T
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 10% better turbo clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.05 GHz | vs | 2.35 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 65 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Sep, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 43.88W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 47.3 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 13.01 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G550T
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium G3220
3,155
Celeron G550T
2,073
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium G3220
1,745
Celeron G550T
1,136
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G550T |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 54W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 3.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI | |
Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G550T |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 65°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.05 GHz | 2.35 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.05 GHz | 2.35 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 17,066.66 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Pentium G3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron G550T ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $70 | |
3220 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $70 | |
E8400 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $70 | |
G2030 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $70 | |
G1840 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $70 | |
2100 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $70 | |
G3240 vs G3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||