0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1850 |
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G3220
![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron G1850
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron G1850
![]() | Newer Feb, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Sep, 2013 | Release date 5 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1850
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
4,338
Celeron G1850
4,446.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
2,392
Celeron G1850
2,244.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
171,700 MB/s
Celeron G1850
121.5 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium G3220
3,155
Celeron G1850
2,897
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium G3220
1,745
Celeron G1850
1,660
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1850 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 54W | 53W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 12.77 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 46.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 2.26 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 43.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1850 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Pentium G3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron G1850 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | $70 | |
4130 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $70 | |
3220 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $70 | |
E8400 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $70 | |
2100 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $70 | |
G2030 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$47 | $70 | |
G1840 vs G3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$205 | $70 | |
2400 vs G3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||