Intel Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1850 |
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G3220
 | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz | | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron G1850
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron G1850
| | Newer Feb, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Sep, 2013 | Release date 5 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1850
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 54W | 53W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 12.77 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 46.43 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 2.26 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 43.06W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium G3220  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron G1850 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | $70 | |
| 4130 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $70 | |
| 3220 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $145 | $70 | |
| E8400 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $70 | |
| 2100 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $76 | $70 | |
| G2030 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | $70 | |
| G1840 vs G3220 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $70 | |
| 2400 vs G3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
