CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G3220 vs G1840 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium G3220 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G3220  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3220

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 5% better turbo clock speed
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Front view of Intel Celeron G1840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1840

Report a correction
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Sep, 2013 Release date 5 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1840

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium G3220
3.54 mHash/s
Celeron G1840
5.18 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Pentium G3220
8.13 mPixels/s
Celeron G1840
8.62 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium G3220
0.75 fps
Celeron G1840
0.82 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3220
171,700 MB/s
Celeron G1840
160,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G3220  vs
Celeron G1840 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 54W 53W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 12.77 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 46.43 $/year
Performance per watt 2.75 pt/W 2.76 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 43.06W

bus

Architecture DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0
Number of links 0 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Pentium G3220  vs
Celeron G1840 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 72°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 1,050 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Pentium G3220
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1840
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
well. when i compare g3258 vs g3220 vs g1840 i see g3258 > g3220 and g3220 > g1840 then g3258 vs g1840 no winner declared something wrong?
comments powered by Disqus