0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1840 |
Released September, 2013
Intel Pentium G3220
- 3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G3220
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz |
![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron G1840
- 2.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron G1840
![]() | Newer Feb, 2014 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Sep, 2013 | Release date 5 months later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Celeron G1840
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium G3220
3.54 mHash/s
Celeron G1840
5.18 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Pentium G3220
8.13 mPixels/s
Celeron G1840
8.62 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium G3220
0.75 fps
Celeron G1840
0.82 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
4,338
Celeron G1840
4,053
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
2,392
Celeron G1840
2,208
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G3220
171,700 MB/s
Celeron G1840
160,400 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium G3220
3,155
Celeron G1840
2,992
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium G3220
1,745
Celeron G1840
1,651
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 54W | 53W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.01 $/year | 12.77 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 47.3 $/year | 46.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.75 pt/W | 2.76 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 43.88W | 43.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI 2.0 | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 0 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium G3220 | vs | Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Pentium G3220 ![]() | Intel Celeron G1840 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $98 | |
G3220 vs 4130 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $125 | |
G3220 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $76 | |
G3220 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $150 | |
G3220 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $70 | |
G3220 vs G3258 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $179 | |
G3220 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $70 | |
G3220 vs G3240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Viết Hưng (09:55 AM, July 22, 2015)