CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G3220 vs 750k among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Pentium G3220
5.2
Athlon X4 750k
6.5
Core i3 4130
6.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Pentium G3220
6.7
Athlon X4 750k
6.6
Core i3 4130
9.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Pentium G3220
0.8
Athlon X4 750k
0.0
Core i3 4130
1.1
Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Pentium G3220
5.9
Athlon X4 750k
0.0
Core i3 4130
6.7
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Pentium G3220
6.7
Athlon X4 750k
5.0
Core i3 4130
7.4
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Pentium G3220
8.0
Athlon X4 750k
6.5
Core i3 4130
7.6
Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
6.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Pentium G3220
6.8
Athlon X4 750k
5.0
Core i3 4130
7.7

Winner
AMD Athlon X4 750k 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Athlon X4 750k  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium G3220

Front view of Intel Pentium G3220
Front view of AMD Athlon X4 750k

AMD Athlon X4 750k

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G3220

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 3 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 3 MB l3 cache is just OK
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 43.88W vs 81.25W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year vs 24.09 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year vs 87.6 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Sep, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 11 months later
Front view of AMD Athlon X4 750k

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X4 750k

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.5 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.46 GHz vs 3.05 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.01 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G3220 vs Athlon X4 750k

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3220
4,338
Athlon X4 750k
5,585

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3220
2,392
Athlon X4 750k
1,998

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3220
171,700 MB/s
Athlon X4 750k
2,240,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G3220
4,305
Athlon X4 750k
5,201

GeekBench

Pentium G3220
4,628
Athlon X4 750k
5,201

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Pentium G3220
3,130
Athlon X4 750k
3,290

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Pentium G3220
3,155
Athlon X4 750k
4,227

PassMark (Single Core)

Pentium G3220
1,745
Athlon X4 750k
1,364

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium G3220  vs
Athlon X4 750k 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 54W 100W
Annual home energy cost 13.01 $/year 24.09 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 47.3 $/year 87.6 $/year
Performance per watt 2.75 pt/W 8.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 43.88W 81.25W

details

 Pentium G3220  vs
Athlon X4 750k 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 0.5 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.05 GHz 4.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz 5.01 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,009.1 2,303.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.05 GHz 4.46 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Intel Pentium G3220
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X4 750k
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Dope_Pegasus (03:43 AM, February 17, 2015)
Lol my bad. Almost*
La_fakka (05:17 AM, May 8, 2014)
Because the pentium is made by people who can spell words correctly.
Dope_Pegasus (06:12 AM, January 6, 2014)
Why is the g3220 almots as good as x4 750k?
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss