CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2030 vs 5400K among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A6 5400K 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 5400K  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G2030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G2030

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 5400K

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5400K

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.46 GHz vs 3.1 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.03 GHz vs 3.16 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2030 vs A6 5400K

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Pentium G2030
2.68 mHash/s
A6 5400K
38.48 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Pentium G2030
4.1 mPixels/s
A6 5400K
4.55 mPixels/s

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark

A6 5400K
2,281

Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark

A6 5400K
2,712

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 5400K
2,916

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 5400K
1,906

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium G2030
157,000 MB/s
A6 5400K
2,125,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G2030  vs
A6 5400K 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 65W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 2.19 pt/W 6.62 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 52.81W

details

Pentium G2030  vs
A6 5400K 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 4.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.16 GHz 5.03 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,269.1 1,170.5
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 4.46 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 7540D
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 760 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Intel Pentium G2030
Report a correction
AMD A6 5400K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus