CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2030 vs 5300

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
Intel Pentium G2030 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G2030  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium G2030

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium G2030

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G2030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G2030

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 0.5 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,615 vs 1,271 More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 52.81W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark score 2,945 vs 2,030 More than 45% better PassMark score
Slightly better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,964 vs 2,732 More than 45% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better performance per watt 8.83 pt/W vs 6.11 pt/W Around 45% better performance per watt
Marginally newer Apr, 2013 vs Oct, 2012 Release date 6 months later
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A4 5300

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5300

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Slightly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.34 GHz vs 3.12 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better performance per dollar 9.61 pt/$ vs 7.59 pt/$ More than 25% better performance per dollar
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.89 GHz vs 3.16 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2030 vs A4 5300

GeekBench (32-bit)

A4 5300
2,732

GeekBench

A4 5300
2,732

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

A4 5300
3,250
Pentium G2030 A4 5300 @ community.futuremark.com

Passmark (Single Core)

A4 5300
1,271

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G2030  vs
A4 5300 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 7480D

details

Pentium G2030  vs
A4 5300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 0.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 3 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.12 GHz 4.34 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.16 GHz 4.89 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.12 GHz 4.34 GHz

power consumption

TDP 55W 65W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 8.83 pt/W 6.11 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 52.81W
Intel Pentium G2030
Report a correction
AMD A4 5300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus