Intel Pentium G2020 vs 4 515 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G2020
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 3,804 | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
VS
Released July, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 515
- 2.93 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 4 515
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.92 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 3,804 | vs | 745 | More than 5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 2.11 pt/W | vs | 0.99 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 68.25W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Jul, 2005 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.93 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.92 GHz | vs | 3.03 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs 4 515
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G2020 | vs | 4 515 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.11 pt/W | 0.99 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 68.25W | |
details | Pentium G2020 | vs | 4 515 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 29 | 22 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.03 GHz | 3.92 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.93 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,960.3 | 725.9 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.03 GHz | 3.92 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Pentium G2020  Report a correction |  Intel Pentium 4 515 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $75 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $76 | $75 | |
| Intel Pentium G2030 vs G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $75 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $75 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $135 | $75 | |
| Intel Core i3 2120 vs Pentium G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $70 | $75 | |
| Intel Pentium G620 vs G2020 | ||
 | VS | |
| $85 | $75 | |
| Intel Pentium G860 vs G2020 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
