Winner
Intel Core i5 2400
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 2400 based on its .
See full details Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i5 2400 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G2020
 | Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2400
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
8.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 2400
| | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz | | More cores 4 |
| | More threads 4 | | Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2020 vs 2400 among desktop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 93.6W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 100.92 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 27.75 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.54 GHz | vs | 3.03 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.51 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs Core i5 2400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G2020 | vs | Core i5 2400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 27.75 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 100.92 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.11 pt/W | 8.14 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 93.6W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium G2020 | vs | Core i5 2400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 29 | 31 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 3 | 63 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.03 GHz | 3.54 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 3.51 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,960.3 | 3,244.5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.03 GHz | 3.54 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium G2020  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 2400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $75 | |
| 3220 vs G2020 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | $205 | |
| 3470 vs 2400 | ||
| | VS | |
| $125 | $205 | |
| 3220 vs 2400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $144 | $205 | |
| 650 vs 2400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $205 | |
| 2600 vs 2400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $205 | |
| 2500 vs 2400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $150 | $205 | |
| 2100 vs 2400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
