Winner
Intel Pentium G2020
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G2020 based on its .
See full details Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 2100 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
6.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G2020
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i3 2100
- 3.1 GHz
- Dual core
5.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i3 2100
| | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | | Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz |
| | More threads 4 |
by Tech Radar (Apr, 2011)It probably doesn't need saying, but even at its overclocked speed the gaming performance of the graphics core is practically nonexistent for high-end 3D games.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2020 vs 2100 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 6.5 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 2100
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G2020 | vs | Core i3 2100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Pentium G2020 | vs | Core i3 2100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 29 | 31 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 3 | 101 | |
| Overclock review score | 0.8 | 4.5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.03 GHz | 3.22 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,960.3 | 1,518.9 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.03 GHz | 3.22 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 37.88 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 93.47 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.09 pt/W | 1.4 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 98.28W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Pentium G2020  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 2100 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $75 | $125 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $150 | ||
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs AMD E1 1200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $150 | $70 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Pentium G620 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $150 | $205 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs i5 2400 | ||
| | VS | |
| $150 | $125 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $150 | ||
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $150 | $146 | |
| Intel Core i3 2100 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i3 6100U vs N4200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A6 7th Gen A6-9220 | ||
