CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2020 vs SU2300

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Value

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Value

Winner
Intel Pentium G2020 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium G2020  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium G2020

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium G2020

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium G2020

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium G2020

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,560 vs 494 Around 3.2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better performance per dollar 6.42 pt/$ vs 1.04 pt/$ Around 6.2x better performance per dollar
Marginally newer Jan, 2013 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,805 vs 1,166 More than 3.2x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 2,769 vs 801 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 44.69W 5.5x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 13.89 pt/W vs 8.28 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 48.18 $/year 5.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 13.25 $/year 5.5x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs Celeron SU2300

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium G2020  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1155
BGA 956
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 55W 10W
Annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 8.28 pt/W 13.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 44.69W 8.13W

details

Pentium G2020  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 45 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 3 2

gpu

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium G2020
Report a correction
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus