Intel Pentium G2020 vs Celeron G1610 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
7.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G2020
 | Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz | | Significantly better PassMark score 2,780 |
| | Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score 0.48 fps | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,560 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of G2020 vs G1610 among desktop CPUs (45 to 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Pentium G2020CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better PassMark score | 2,780 | vs | 2,529 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
| Better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | 0.48 fps | vs | 0.14 fps | More than 3.2x better CompuBench 1.5 T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,560 | vs | 1,401 | More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.04 GHz | vs | 2.68 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron G1610 vs the Pentium G2020. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs Celeron G1610
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Data courtesy FutureMark
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G2020 | vs | Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 55W | 55W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.6 pt/W | 2.52 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 44.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium G2020 | vs | Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 29 | 26 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 3 | 6 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.04 GHz | 2.68 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,960.3 | 2,763.7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.04 GHz | 2.68 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 1,050 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium G2020  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron G1610 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $158 | $238 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $158 | $196 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $158 | $150 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 2100 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $158 | $135 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs Core i3 2120 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $158 | $85 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs G860 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $158 | $76 | |
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs G2030 | ||
 | VS | |
| $49 | $238 | |
| Intel Celeron G1610 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $393 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $227 | $393 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 5200U vs AMD A8 7410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $663 | $743 | |
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs i7 6500U | ||
| | VS | |
| $281 | $663 | |
| Intel Core i5 5200U vs 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i5 5200U vs Pentium N3700 | ||
 | VS | |
| $378 | $743 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700HQ vs 6500U | ||
