0 Comments
| Intel Pentium G2020 vs AMD Athlon II X2 270 |
Released January, 2013
Intel Pentium G2020
- 2.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium G2020
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 44.69W |
![]() | Newer Jan, 2013 | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year |
VS
Released May, 2011
AMD Athlon II X2 270
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon II X2 270
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.02 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 52.81W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer | Jan, 2013 | vs | May, 2011 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 3.03 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.09 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium G2020 vs Athlon II X2 270
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G2020
3,870
Athlon II X2 270
3,132
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G2020
2,132
Athlon II X2 270
1,716
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G2020
151,400 MB/s
Athlon II X2 270
136,900 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G2020
3,804
Athlon II X2 270
3,028
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium G2020
4,092
Athlon II X2 270
3,506
GeekBench
Pentium G2020
4,092
Athlon II X2 270
3,506
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium G2020
2,770
Athlon II X2 270
1,990
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium G2020
1,560
Athlon II X2 270
1,155
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium G2020 | vs | Athlon II X2 270 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Pentium G2020 | vs | Athlon II X2 270 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 3 | 1 | |
Overclock review score | 0.8 | 0 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 3.03 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 4.09 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,960.3 | 810.1 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.03 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 55W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.11 pt/W | 2.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 44.69W | 52.81W |
Intel Pentium G2020 ![]() | AMD Athlon II X2 270 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
G2020 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $150 | |
G2020 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $179 | |
G2020 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $76 | |
G2020 vs G2030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $85 | |
G2020 vs G860 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $135 | |
G2020 vs 2120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
270 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Kaught (08:17 AM, June 18, 2014)