CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E6800 vs 420 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Pentium E6800 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium E6800  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium E6800

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium E6800

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium E6800

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium E6800

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.33 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.37 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,369 vs 544 More than 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2010 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 60.4 °C Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better PassMark score 2,036 vs 452 More than 4.5x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron M 420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 420

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Better performance per dollar 1.57 pt/$ vs 1.49 pt/$ More than 5% better performance per dollar
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E6800 vs Celeron M 420

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium E6800
140,500 MB/s
Celeron M 420
66,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium E6800  vs
Celeron M 420 
Clock speed 3.33 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 65W 35W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 2.13 pt/W 1.57 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium E6800  vs
Celeron M 420 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 228,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 12 8
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.36V 1 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 74.1°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.37 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.33 GHz 3.38 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.37 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium E6800
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 420
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus