Intel Pentium E6700 vs Core2 Duo E6700 |
Released April, 2010
Intel Pentium E6700
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E6700
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.97 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E6700
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 74.1 °C | vs | 60.1 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | vs | 3.35 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E6700 vs Core2 Duo E6700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E6700 | vs | Core2 Duo E6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.04 pt/W | 1.69 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 1,066 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Pentium E6700 | vs | Core2 Duo E6700 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 228,000,000 | 291,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 12 | 10 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.36V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 60.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 5 | 7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.97 GHz | 3.35 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.97 GHz | 3.35 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium E6700  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo E6700 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $75 | $179 | |
| E6700 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $125 | |
| E6700 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | $200 | |
| E6700 vs E8500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| E6700 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS |  |
| E6700 vs E6600 | ||
| | VS | |
| E6700 vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| E6700 vs E8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
