0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5800 vs Celeron E3200 |
Released November, 2010
Intel Pentium E5800
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5800
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.17 GHz | vs | 3.82 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.34 GHz | vs | 4.2 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron E3200 vs the Pentium E5800. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium E5800 vs Celeron E3200
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5800
2,954
Celeron E3200
2,394
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5800
1,616
Celeron E3200
1,326
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium E5800
134,800 MB/s
Celeron E3200
109,650 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5800 | vs | Celeron E3200 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium E5800 | vs | Celeron E3200 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.17 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.34 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.17 GHz | 3.82 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.02 pt/W | 1.8 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 52.81W |
Intel Pentium E5800 ![]() | Intel Celeron E3200 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $179 | |
E5800 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5800 vs E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5800 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
E5800 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $125 | |
E5800 vs E7400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $200 | |
E5800 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $75 | |
E5800 vs E6500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||