0 Comments
| Intel Pentium E5800 vs AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
Released November, 2010
Intel Pentium E5800
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5800
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
- 1.45 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.45 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 52.81W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium E5800 vs Sempron Sempron™ 2650
clock speed
Pentium E5800
3.2 GHz
Sempron Sempron™ 2650
1.45 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium E5800
2 MB
TDP
Pentium E5800
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5800 | vs | Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.45 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
FMA4 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES |
details | Pentium E5800 | vs | Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 28 nm | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ R3 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 12.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 20.31W |
Intel Pentium E5800 ![]() | AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
E8400 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
E7500 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | ||
Q6600 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
3220 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $72 | |
E8500 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
Q8400 vs E5800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$67 | $72 | |
E5400 vs E5800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||