Intel Pentium E5800 vs AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
Released November, 2010
Intel Pentium E5800
- 3.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium E5800
 | Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
- 1.45 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm |
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C | | Much lower typical power consumption 20.31W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 1.45 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 74.1 °C | More than 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 20.31W | vs | 52.81W | 2.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 6.02 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | 2.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 21.9 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium E5800 vs Sempron Sempron™ 2650
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium E5800 | vs | Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.45 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
details | Pentium E5800 | vs | Sempron Sempron™ 2650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 28 nm | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 74.1°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ R3 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 12.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 20.31W | |
 Intel Pentium E5800  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron Sempron™ 2650 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | $72 | |
| E8400 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $72 | |
| 3220 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $72 | |
| E7500 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | ||
| Q6600 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $72 | |
| E8500 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $72 | |
| E7400 vs E5800 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $72 | |
| Q8400 vs E5800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
